中国药物警戒 ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 169-175.
DOI: 10.19803/j.1672-8629.2022.02.12

• 法规与管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

对药物研发与技术审评沟通交流中常见统计学专业问题的探讨

李新旭, 唐智敏, 周军, 谭明敏, 卢明亮, 王景朝, 王骏*   

  1. 国家药品监督管理局药品审评中心,北京 100022
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-31 出版日期:2022-02-15 发布日期:2022-02-15
  • 通讯作者: *王骏,男,博士,研究员,药品技术审评。E-mail:wangj@cde.org.cn
  • 作者简介:李新旭,男,博士,研究员,药品技术审评。
  • 基金资助:
    重大新药创制国家科技重大专项2017年度(2017ZX09101001)

Common questions about statistics in communication between drug sponsors and regulators in China

LI Xinxu, TANG Zhimin, ZHOU Jun, TAN Mingmin, LU Mingliang, WANG Jingzhao, WANG Jun*   

  1. Center for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing 100022, China
  • Received:2021-03-31 Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-02-15

摘要: 目的 总结药物研发与技术审评沟通交流中经常咨询的统计学专业问题,分析不足并提出改进建议,以期帮助药品注册申请人优化沟通交流申请,进一步提高与国家药品监督管理局药品审评中心(CDE)的沟通效率。方法 从CDE药品技术审评系统的沟通交流子系统中收集2018年至2020年由药品注册申请人提交且由笔者经手处理的沟通交流申请,提取出统计学专业咨询问题,归纳分类后选取共性咨询问题,分析不规范之处,阐述监管考虑。结果 共收集400余个沟通交流申请,经常咨询的统计学专业问题涉及到临床试验的样本量估算与检验界值、多重性问题、适应性设计、期中分析、桥接研究、全球多区域临床试验的中国亚组评价等,分析发现主要不规范之处在于存在未能提供充足的支持性资料、问题关注点错位或不明确等,并根据这些情况给出相应的监管考虑。结论 良好的沟通交流离不开交流双方的共同努力。建议药品注册申请人优化沟通交流申请,确保支持性资料充足、重点关注问题明确,以提高沟通交流效率。

关键词: 药物研发, 技术审评, 沟通交流, 统计学, 监管考虑

Abstract: Objective To encourage drug sponsors to optimize communication applications and to improve the efficiency of communication with the Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) of National Medical Products Administration in China by summarizing the common questions about statistics encountered in communication between drug developers and technical reviewers, analyzing the flaws, and giving proposals for improvement. Methods The communication applications submitted by drug sponsors and handled by the author in the communication subsystem of the CDE drug technical review system between 2018 and 2020 were collected. Statistics-related questions were extracted from applications and categorized and then the commonly-asked questions were selected from categories. Finally, the inadequacies of these common questions were analyzed and regulatory considerations for improvement were elaborated. Results More than 400 communication applications were collected. The common questions related to statistics involved sample size estimations and margins of hypothesis tests, multiplicities, adaptive designs, interim analyses, bridging studies in clinical trials, and Chinese subgroup evaluations of global multi-regional clinical trials. The analysis results showed that there were such inadequacies as insufficient supporting information and misplaced or implicit questions. Accordingly, corresponding regulatory considerations were recommended. Conclusion Good communication requires the joint efforts of both sides. It is hoped that drug sponsors will optimize communication applications, ensure the sufficiency of supporting information and ask explicit questions so as to improve the efficiency of communication.

Key words: drug development, technical review, communication, statistics, regulatory considerations

中图分类号: