中国药物警戒 ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (8): 769-771.
DOI: 10.19803/j.1672-8629.2021.08.15

• 法规与管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国化妆品安全风险信息交流机制分析与思考

李岚, 孔繁瑶, 朱盈, 沈璐*   

  1. 国家药品监督管理局药品评价中心,北京 100022
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-29 出版日期:2021-08-15 发布日期:2021-08-17
  • 通讯作者: *沈璐,女,硕士,副主任药师,化妆品不良反应监测。E-mail:shenlu@cdr-adr.org.cn
  • 作者简介:李岚,女,硕士,主管药师,化妆品不良反应监测。

Information Exchange Mechanism of Cosmetic Safety Risks in China

LI Lan, KONG Fanyao, ZHU Ying, SHEN Lu*   

  1. Center for Drug Reevaluation, NMPA, Beijing 100022, China
  • Received:2020-09-29 Online:2021-08-15 Published:2021-08-17

摘要: 目的 分析我国与公众交流化妆品安全风险信息机制,为完善我国监管部门与公众的化妆品安全风险信息交流制度提供参考。方法 分析2019年《化妆品警戒快讯》交流内容,梳理我国化妆品安全风险信息交流渠道,提出思考和建议。结果 我国已建立多种面向公众的化妆品安全风险信息发布渠道,取得良好社会效益,但在交流机制上还需要完善。结论 建议健全我国化妆品与公众的安全风险信息交流机制。

关键词: 化妆品, 化妆品警戒快讯, 安全风险信息, 交流机制

Abstract: Objective To analyze the information exchange mechanism for cosmetic safety risks in China in order to provide reference for upgrading the system of information exchange related to safety risks of cosmetics in China. Methods The way in which information was exchanged by Cosmetics Vigilance Briefing(2019)was analyzed, while the means by which information about risks of cosmetics was exchanged were categorized before recommendations were made. Results A variety of channels for release of information on safety risks of cosmetics were opened to the public and achieved good social benefits, but the mechanism of exchange needed to be improved. Conclusion More mechanisms for such exchange of information with the public should be made accessible.

Key words: cosmetics, Cosmetics Vigilance Briefing, information on safety risks, exchange mechanism

中图分类号: